Today there is some brouhaha on the Times threads about Lord Stern, author of a key UK climate change report, who is now saying that we will need to become vegetarian to combat climate change. Here’s the article link:
So far this has attracted 550+ comments which is substantially more than the number of people who commented about intelligence and IQ tests and how we can improve our collective intelligence. Interesting, hmmn that people are more interested in going online to refute his points about methane production from bovines and that he’s producing more “hot air” than a cow.
Never mind, I’ll continue with my journey towards harnessing and increasing collective intelligence.
INTERCONNECTING DIVERSE DISCIPLINES
So when not architecting and implementing business strategies or in code bunker, there are three hobbies I allocate time to:
(1.) travelling;
(2.) cooking; and
(3.) knitting
Each has a discipline, a methodology and a culture that can inform the way strategy and code are approached. This may not be immediately obvious but they all require the following:
* planning
* sourcing of materials
* application processes
* troubleshooting
* end experience
and these also apply to strategy and code. There are transferrable skills from each which can be cross-applied and synergized into project management, creative problem-solving and the re-imagination of solutions by gaining alternative perspectives on the original problem.
We often hear the phrases:
* “What Company X’s cooking in its labs.”
* “We’re weaving the Web.”
Well, at the moment I’m knitting a rainbow-colored gilet like so, including with cabling:
Plus weaving 360-2020 profile pages like so — with something called a Navigator and the types of customizable features I’d want on a social network:
The key difference between 360-2020 and other social media applications and platforms is that 360-2020 aims to be a seed for the development of a Conscious Web.
In the same way that when I can’t find some knitting in the stores that suits my utility, I go right ahead and knit what I really want from scratch, since the social media innovations to-date aren’t doing the types of things I believe they should do (enabling us to differentiate between content — including whatever’s marketed and advertised; including consumers in the production value chain; and contextualizing the consequences of that marketing with consumption that affects climate change)…………I’m weaving it from scratch.
No, there are no plans to create yet another socmed cool app that’s fun, but (ultimately) serves no serious purpose. There are also no plans to do a Lord Stern and advise everyone to become vegetarian; I trialled it for July 2009 and would never recommend or impose permanent vegetarianism on anyone.
There are much more intelligent policies and pragmatic solutions we can innovate — if we would properly analyse and apply our own human and collective intelligence by synergizing both, :*).
Following is an sanitized version of an exchange I had with a friend of mine about taxonomies in relation to Semantic representations.
First, a Google Tech Talk on ‘Visual Perception with Deep Learning’ — 10 April 2008 :
————————————————————————————
I do appreciate the value of taxonomies. It’s the way most scientific classifications are arrived upon. For example, we have a periodic table structure which provides:
(i.) high-level overview of each of the seven groups of chemicals;
(ii) information about how many outer electrons are in each shell according to their membership of a particular group (this proxies parent-child identities); and
(iii.) how they could possibly connect and interact with another chemical from another group.
I also came across this interesting article on the ’10 Myths of Taxonomies’ which essentially highlights the risks involved in having to adopt someone else’s sets of taxonomies — particularly one in which we have no democratic voice or implementation:
There seems to be this postulation amongst the Singularity brigade that
increased AI smartness ===> increased collective intelligence
The counter-argument would be…..
increased AI smartness ===> decreased collective human intelligence
(because they’ll have to think less)
AAAAARGH! QUICK! STOP THE GLOBAL BRAIN EXPRESS!
Personally, I don’t believe the proliferation of information pre-processed by AI necessarily makes each one of us SMARTER. It actually means the knowledge of how that AI was structured to pre-process the information is in the brains of a few select bleeding edge techies and everyone else is simply sheep-like or “dogs eat the dog food” like following whatever results are generated! (Incidentally, this is an anachronistic phrase from Microsoft circa 1988 still apparently being bandied around Silicon Valley — supposedly the cradle of avant garde progress, and let’s bear in mind we’re in 2008 and are supposed to be advancing humans not denigrating their intelligence or identities by ill-thought out associations).
It is possible we humans will erode our own capacity to perceive, to reason, to innovate and to communicate because some of us are too readily abdicating our responsibilities to do so to the machines!
However, we don’t have anything to really worry about because I’m going to share a simple truth…….
THE SINGULARITY IS A PIPE DREAM
The Singularity is unlikely to happen in the way the futurologists insist or according to their timescale of 2040. They all read far too much science fiction and need to more closely proxy terra firma.
Moreover, as evinced by my exclusion from a certain SemWeb some form of ideological eugenics and police state is going to apply to the Global Brain. Not everyone will be invited or have access to plug into it. As much as technologists bleat and spin on like autobots about open source and open house, Terms of Service and contracts (as well as undemocratic feudal warlord oppression of the serfs) will still apply as it has since land laws of C12th England.
TechCo SAYS it’s open this and open that, Google and wannabe minnows alike. However, notice how each tech platform imposes its (sometimes Draconian and contradictory) rules and evicts those whose opinions are different (or threatens to as per the unimaginative and inflexible mindset of the Administrator — please also see Kafka’s writings or Orwell’s ‘Animal Farm’).
This is why the Global Brain is never going to be truly global, open or democratic. The controllers/owners can be dictators and the constituents are the conformists, not necessarily by choice or personal conviction but by consideration towards others which is not reflected in a similar equivalence of respect towards them.
Interestingly, it’s well-documented that it could be the unconventionals who “think out of the box” and may be touched by genius or madness, and create the quantum-level breakthroughs in thinking — please see Einstein, Dali, Dosteovsky, other artistic intellectuals and bipolarly brilliant but insane people (more often than not the world’s greatest comedians).
INTELLIGENCE: THE KIDS IN THE CLASSROOM + ONLINE
Let me make this observation. In a class of 30 kids who are 5 years-old they all have exactly the same access to the same stimulus, reading materials, toys, etc. Yet there will always be 1 kid who is knock out quicker and brighter than their peers.
In the same way, every teenager has the same access to the index of information on the Internet. Yet only 1% of those teenagers will actively go in search of the wealth of knowledge with the specific intent of increasing their own know how.
Technologists and educators imagine that if kids get more tools this will make them smarter.
Not necessarily. It depends on their pre-existing mental orientation, character traits and emotional sense of reward about knowledge. Some of them assign 0 value to knowledge and +1 to Grand Theft Auto rankings.
FUN+GAMES
Certain proponents of the Global Brain theories and the Singularity are probably breathing huge sighs of relief I’m nowhere near them to present obvious and prescient counter perspectives. They can postulate we’ll all have boosted collective IQs (by the osmosis of proximity to smarter AI) without my notes of pragmatic perspective. Oh and we haven’t factored in the ego element of consciousness and self-awareness yet either!
Ack! Taxonomies is one thing. If the perception of the person doing the classification is not spot on or nuanced in the first place the mandolin ends up being related to a string instrument because it looks like violin (plus dyslexia or plain ignorance could be involved).
It’s not the taxonomic tags that show Paris is either a city, a personality or a romantic aspiration which ultimately matters, imo. It’s actually what emotions it evokes and elicits in a person: nostalgia, disregard or longing which help each of us discern meaning from the world and intakes around us.
PERCEPTIONS MORE THAN TAXONOMIES
I’m leaving others to think out the taxonomies issue. The perception dimension has interested me more since childhood. In terms of semantics, graphing the connections that a grape is a fruit that we eat and make wine out of and grows on a vine is less interesting and challenging to me than trying to figure out WHY people like to eat grapes, to drink wine and designate all kinds of adjectives to it — sweet, succulent, tannin aftertaste, globulous, shriveled, meaty, aromatic, green, over-ripe etc. — which reveal their personalities, life aspirations and purchase decisions.
It’s the perception dimension I’m coding a tool to capture…………………….
Over the next fortnight I’ll be writing about the main constituents of the Global Brain and publishing that here as well as on Google Knol (http://knol.google.com/k/the-global-brain-singularity-and-360/31fjy9fjsu1x2/19#).
Topics which will be covered in the full posting (release date: 26 November 2008) include:
(i.) origins of the Global Brain and associated concepts
(ii.) historical context of collective human intelligence
(iii.) major schools of thought on the Singularity
(iv.) key proponents and detractors such as Ray Kurzweil, Vernor Vinge, Stephen Hawkings, Richard Dawkins, Pierre Levy, Peter Thiel/Mark Zuckerberg, and Anthony Berglas
(v.) relationships with Moore’s Law, Aasimov’s science fiction, William Gibson’s Neuromancer and other creative efforts
(vi.) consciousness paradigms from Confucius to Clay Shirky
(vii.) current and theoretical technological models on achieving the Singularity
(viii.) economic implications and GAIA revolutions
(ix.) gender and cultural identity within the Global Brain matrix
(x.) human existence and potential neural saturation post-Singularity
As part of this piece, I’m currently reading ‘How the body shapes the way we think’ by Rolf Pfeifer and Josh Bongard, published by MIT Press Books.
Rivals to the iPad will come in similar shapes but all screen sizes, judging by the launches here in Berlin on Thursday of tablets from Samsung and Toshiba (pictured). The competition is also packing its cheaper devices with features the iPad may not have for some time, such as cameras with video calling. Tim Bradshaw gave […]
Google, Amazon, Netflix, Apple, Hulu and Sony are all providing a way for viewers to purchase video content online. However today’s Lex writes that content providers might not be fully on board just yet: “While renting out old shows and films individually or on subscription generates some extra cash, there is little incentive to […]
There are two ways one could think about Samsung’s new Galaxy Tab. One would be to look at its slick casing, its compact 7-inch form, the latest Android software and extensive 3G support from European mobile operators, and say: here is a device which proves the iPad isn’t the only show in town. The other would be […]
Apple is making a more serious bid for the set top box market with 99 cent TV and $4.99 new movie rentals that are streamed through a smaller version of AppleTV. Chief executive Steve Jobs introduced the new device at an event in San Francisco. It will cost $99, down from $229, and is available for […]
Sony is challenging Apple and Google with an internet “cloud-based” music streaming service that will be available on many of its networked consumer electronics products. The MusicUnlimited service was announced at IFA, a major consumer electronics show in Berlin, barely an hour before Apple’s own music-themed press conference in California. After the jump, […]
The FT tried something new today. We took to Twitter to answer questions about one of the day’s bigger news stories in the digital-media world: that the UK’s advertising regulator, the ASA, is extending its rules on accuracy and decency into corporate websites, social networks, blogs and mobile apps. Seeing as many people already discuss the […]
Just ahead of Apple’s expected announcement of an autumn refresh of its iPod lineup today, SanDisk has unveiled an update to a rival portable media player in the sub-$100 category. SanDisk claims parity in market share with Apple where the iPod shuffle plays and says its Sansa Fuze+ has far more features. Daniel Schreiber, head of […]
Hewlett-Packard is announcing an entertainment-oriented refresh to its notebook computer line today–and the most notable addition comes with its own 3D glasses. The HP Envy 17 3D’s glasses automatically turn on when the user is watching a 3D Blu-ray DVD on the machine and then turn off again, giving the glasses a projected year of […]
This is a guest post by FT Media Editor Andrew Edgecliffe-Johnson Not much has been heard of Beyond Oblivion since the FT pulled back the veil on its ambitious vision of tackling piracy by asking devices manufacturers and broadband providers to pay for music consumed over their products and services. At the time, we reported that Adam […]
One of the trickiest challenges for a company is continuous innovation - to keep updating and refreshing its products when the excitement of a product launch is past - so I take my hat off to Google. In contrast to Microsoft, which in the past let products such as Internet Explorer and Hotmail get […]